Based on our map of qualitative research strategies (found here), where does this study fit: focus, approach, purpose, and philosophy.
Where and how was positionality discussed in this paper? How would more discussion of positionality have helped the paper, or would it have helped?
Where and what is the problem statement?
How and where did they establish the importance of this investigation?
Does the literature review seem sufficient for the paper? Is anything missing that you expected to see? Was it presented in a manner that is appropriate for this paper?
Discuss any positives or negatives that you can get from reviewing the reference list.
Was the sample formed in a reasonable manner? How would you have done it differently?
Were the methods appropriate for the study? Is there anything you expected to see in the methods section that was not there?
What were your impressions of their coding strategies? Were they described well enough that you are comfortable with what they did?
What are the limitations of this study either presented by the authors or that you see in addition?
How confident are you that they “got it right” in Wolcott’s term. Where and how have they discussed trustworthiness or generalizability? What specific strategies did they use to increase trustworthiness?